Piaget Possession

Any among us may have admired a good backside (on any gender) now and then. Having a less-than-compelling one myself (trust me on this), I perhaps compensate by acquiring watches with interesting reverses. Mind you, I am no connoisseur of haute horlogerie

Dear Art, Thank you for your candid feedback and for expressing your concern. I completely understand why you might feel skeptical when someone mentions commerce in a first post, and I appreciate the vigilance you maintain on the WatchProSite forum. I wan

putting the "original" and the modern Polo side by side, i do see similarity in the shape of their cases NB: Moderator text update. The Piaget Polo from 1979 and the modern Piaget skeleton watch represent two distinct eras of luxury watchmaking, showcasin

guard dog 🐕 protecting your prized possession! Are you sure that it will ALLOW you to take the box away from it ? Any hints ? Sporty, classic, chrono, travel time , ding 🛎️ ding 🛎️ ding 🛎️ , etc ???,

I always thought that since 2015 or 2016 all Patek sold had to be removed from their plastic seal before the client takes possession of it. I am therefore surprised that Sly's Grandmaster Chime remained in its original sealed plastic packaging. Patek shou

. . . which didn't include a ref 2364 with your dial. There's two vaguely similar in the section devoted to ref 2364, but with out punched markers and vacated minute track. There's scant doubt in my mind that the dial of your 2364 was produced contemporan

Yes indeed ! It’s back in my possession after some extensive repairs and 5months wait I finally got the call to pickup my timepiece.. was actually so happy because usually it can take up to a year if the decide to restore it .. the gave me complete new mo

...and again, a key piece of this is the watch never left my uncle's possession between 1967-68 or so and 2013 when he gave it to me. That would mean, in theory, that the watch is actually a '50s reference. If the dial is redone, maybe it suffered some so

. . . but still waiting for delivery. I've owned two Mk II Speedmasters in the past but both are long gone. This is the first Pro in my possession. Planning on visiting my watchmaker Friday to assess its performance; might not wear it 'til then.

at least can take pleasure in the time it was in our possession. No matter how much we love our objects, they may not be forever and memories may have to suffice despite the sadness of loss. If we are truly worse off for the monetary loss, it probably was